Specific findings and visible gaps are more useful than a single reassuring number.
A single number can hide very different situations. One application may have a reproduced access-control problem. Another may have several small interface issues. A third may have very little completed coverage.
Keep the decisions specific
A useful report should explain the problem, its impact, the evidence behind it, and the next step. Priorities can help you order the work, but a priority label does not replace supporting evidence.
Keep unknowns in the picture
An untested payment flow remains untested even if every accessible public page behaved as expected. Combining those results into one reassuring score would obscure the decision you actually need to make.
VibeCheck is being built to support your judgment with evidence. It does not deploy your application or guarantee readiness. The approved approach blocks a deployment recommendation when a Critical Issue remains unresolved.